Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger

First Circuit

Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger

339 F.2d 604, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 114

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 1964

Docket6408_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 339 F.2d 604 (Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magic Fingers, Inc. v. Robert E. Auger, 339 F.2d 604, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 114 (1st Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The very most that can be said for the appellant’s patent is that it discloses a mere mechanic’s adaptation of a device in public use and on sale more than a year before the patent was applied for to make that earlier device more readily attachable to the basic structure with, which it was designed to cooperate to-produce a vibrating chair or bed. We-see no need to elaborate upon the District Court’s fully and carefully reasoned opinion. D.C., 232 F.Supp. 372.

Judgment will be entered affirming the-judgment of the District Court dismissing count one of the plaintiff’s complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The very most that can be said for the appellant’s patent is that it discloses a mere mechanic’s adaptation of a device in public use and on sale more than a year before the patent was applied for to make that earlier device more readily attachable to the basic structure with, which it was designed to cooperate to-produce a vibrating chair or bed. We-see no need to elaborate upon the District Court’s fully and carefully reasoned opinion. D.C., 232 F.Supp. 372.

Judgment will be entered affirming the-judgment of the District Court dismissing count one of the plaintiff’s complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

339 F.2d 604, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magic-fingers-inc-v-robert-e-auger-ca1-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack