Maggie P. Tookes v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, Individually and as District Director of Internal Revenue

312 F.2d 398, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 553, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6354
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1963
Docket19634_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 312 F.2d 398 (Maggie P. Tookes v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, Individually and as District Director of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maggie P. Tookes v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, Individually and as District Director of Internal Revenue, 312 F.2d 398, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 553, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6354 (5th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue sought to protect its claim against the Estate of Bishop H. Y. Tookes, deceased, for income taxes of the decedent by a transferee assessment of something over $100,000 against the appellant, the widow of the deceased. In a suit brought by the holder of a mortgage given by the appellant, the District Director of Internal Revenue intervened. Upon foreclosure sale there was a realization of $2,-788.47 in excess of the amount payable to the holder of the mortgage. This amount was paid to the District Director and applied by him upon the transferee assessment. The appellant filed a claim for refund to contest the validity of the *399 transferee assessment. The claim was rejected and suit was brought in the district court. The district court held that the suit could not be maintained for the refund of a partial payment of a tax assessment. The suit was dismissed.

It is here urged by the appellant that the facts here present take the case out of the rule announced in the Flora opinions. 1 We are in agreement with the district court that the Flora rule is applicable and controlling.

The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.

1

. Flora v. United States, 357 U.S. 63, 78 S.Ct. 1079, 2 L.Ed.2d 1165; 362 U.S. 362 U.S. 972, 80 S.Ct. 953, 4 L.Ed.2d 902. 145, 80 S.Ct. 630, 4 L.Ed.2d 623, reh. den.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank Miskovsky v. United States
414 F.2d 954 (Third Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 F.2d 398, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 553, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maggie-p-tookes-v-laurie-w-tomlinson-individually-and-as-district-ca5-1963.