Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District

277 P. 470, 85 Colo. 491, 1929 Colo. LEXIS 233
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 22, 1929·No. No. 12,078.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*492 Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case and the case of Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 85 Colo. 488, 277 Pac. 469, just decided, were tried at the same time. George W. Barlow was the owner of the land, and B. F. Maggard was the tenant. Each sued for damages sustained, it is alleged, by reason of negligence on the part of The North Sterling irrigation district. The two cases are submitted to this court upon the same record and briefs. The decision in the Barlow case is controlling in this case.

The judgment is reversed.

Mr. Chiee Justice 'Whiteord, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 277 P. 470, 85 Colo. 491, 1929 Colo. LEXIS 233 (Colo. 1929).

277 P. 470 (Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of Pueblo
358 P.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Henrylyn Irrigation District v. O'Donnell
58 P.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1936)