Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District

277 P. 470, 85 Colo. 491, 1929 Colo. LEXIS 233
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 22, 1929
DocketNo. 12,078.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 277 P. 470 (Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maggard v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 277 P. 470, 85 Colo. 491, 1929 Colo. LEXIS 233 (Colo. 1929).

Opinion

*492 Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case and the case of Barlow v. North Sterling Irrigation District, 85 Colo. 488, 277 Pac. 469, just decided, were tried at the same time. George W. Barlow was the owner of the land, and B. F. Maggard was the tenant. Each sued for damages sustained, it is alleged, by reason of negligence on the part of The North Sterling irrigation district. The two cases are submitted to this court upon the same record and briefs. The decision in the Barlow case is controlling in this case.

The judgment is reversed.

Mr. Chiee Justice 'Whiteord, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Standard Paint & Glass Co. of Pueblo
358 P.2d 33 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Henrylyn Irrigation District v. O'Donnell
58 P.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 P. 470, 85 Colo. 491, 1929 Colo. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maggard-v-north-sterling-irrigation-district-colo-1929.