Magerus v. Page
This text of 1968 OK CR 20 (Magerus v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an original proceedings in which the petitioner, John William Magerus, seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this Court for his release, for the apparent reason that he entered a plea of guilty because he thought it was useless to go to trial.
The State has filed a Demurrer for the reason that the petition fails to state a cause of action, and more particularly, state that the petition herein affirmatively alleges that petitioner entered a plea of guilty to the charge against him and fails to allege that said plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily. The petitioner admits and acknowledges that he was represented by counsel at the time he entered his plea.
This Court has carefully read the petition, and are of the opinion that the State’s Demurrer should be sustained.
The writ prayed for is, accordingly, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1968 OK CR 20, 437 P.2d 288, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magerus-v-page-oklacrimapp-1968.