Mager v. Sherman
This text of 20 A.D.3d 399 (Mager v. Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for alleged violations of federal constitutional rights, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), entered December 22, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (7).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed each of the causes of action predicated on state law on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to timely serve a notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50-i. In addition, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the federal claims. Although foster parents often provide the same care, love, and support expected of biological or adoptive parents, the foster-family relationship is frequently temporary, contractual in nature, and carefully circumscribed by statute, which authorizes the state to remove a child from a foster home for several reasons. Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs do not have a constitutionally-protected right to preserve the foster parent-child relationship (see Rivera v Marcus, 696 F2d 1016 [1982]).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.E, Krausman, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 A.D.3d 399, 797 N.Y.S.2d 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mager-v-sherman-nyappdiv-2005.