Mager v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 2, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (Mager v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mager v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The referee has not found, and the appellants in the points submitted by them have not shown that, as matter of fact, there is any mortgage or lien upon the property in suit.

The judgment is right upon the merits and the exceptions of the appellants are wholly untenable.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mager-v-metropolitan-el-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.