Magee v. Siggerson

4 Blackf. 70, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 32
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 1835
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Blackf. 70 (Magee v. Siggerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magee v. Siggerson, 4 Blackf. 70, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 32 (Ind. 1835).

Opinion

IN an action of replevin; the writ must contain a description of the goods for which the action is brought; but it need not show that the affidavit; required by the statute, had been made by the plaintiff.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Blackf. 70, 1835 Ind. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magee-v-siggerson-ind-1835.