Magee v. Friedricksen

109 So. 197, 91 Fla. 1078, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 1048
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 So. 197 (Magee v. Friedricksen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magee v. Friedricksen, 109 So. 197, 91 Fla. 1078, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 1048 (Fla. 1926).

Opinion

*1079 Buford, J.

— This was an action brought by a minor, a boy of eleven jmars of age, joined by his next friend, against the owner of a motor vehicle for damages resulting from personal injuries received by the boy when he ran in front of the moving motor vehicle on a public street to retrieve a base ball with which he and other boys were playing. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Writ of Error is brought to this Court.

A plea of contributory negligence was interposed and amply sustained by the proof.

The. judgment should be reversed under authority of Fitzsimmons v. Cesery, 61 Fla. 199 55 So. 467; Wauchula Mfg. Co. v. Jackson, 70 Fla. 596; 70 South. Rep. 599 and German-American Lumber Co. v. Hannah, 60 Fla. 70, 53 South. Rep. 516.

Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffis v. Du Bow
114 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Connell v. Petri
30 So. 2d 922 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
City of Jacksonville Beach v. Jones
131 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 197, 91 Fla. 1078, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magee-v-friedricksen-fla-1926.