Magee v. Friedricksen

109 So. 197, 91 Fla. 1078, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 1048
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 7, 1926·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*1079 Buford, J.

— This was an action brought by a minor, a boy of eleven jmars of age, joined by his next friend, against the owner of a motor vehicle for damages resulting from personal injuries received by the boy when he ran in front of the moving motor vehicle on a public street to retrieve a base ball with which he and other boys were playing. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Writ of Error is brought to this Court.

A plea of contributory negligence was interposed and amply sustained by the proof.

The. judgment should be reversed under authority of Fitzsimmons v. Cesery, 61 Fla. 199 55 So. 467; Wauchula Mfg. Co. v. Jackson, 70 Fla. 596; 70 South. Rep. 599 and German-American Lumber Co. v. Hannah, 60 Fla. 70, 53 South. Rep. 516.

Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magee v. Friedricksen, 109 So. 197, 91 Fla. 1078, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 1048 (Fla. 1926).

109 So. 197 (Magee v. Friedricksen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffis v. Du Bow
114 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Connell v. Petri
30 So. 2d 922 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
City of Jacksonville Beach v. Jones
131 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)