Magee v. Faymour Development Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Magee v. Faymour Development Co.

32 A.D.2d 811, 302 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 811 (Magee v. Faymour Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magee v. Faymour Development Co., 32 A.D.2d 811, 302 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 25, 1968, as granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. We are of the opinion that where a corporation is a party to an action it is entitled to have discovery and inspection of any statements given by its employees to the opposing party (CPLR 3101, [812]*812subd. [e]; CPLR 3120; Briggs v. Spencerport Road Plaza, 19 A D 2d 943; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3101.56). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 25, 1968, as granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate defendant’s notice of discovery and inspection. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. We are of the opinion that where a corporation is a party to an action it is entitled to have discovery and inspection of any statements given by its employees to the opposing party (CPLR 3101, [812]*812subd. [e]; CPLR 3120; Briggs v. Spencerport Road Plaza, 19 A D 2d 943; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3101.56). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 811, 302 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magee-v-faymour-development-co-nyappdiv-1969.