Magdaleno Cruz, Sr. v. Ruben G. Mohme, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 27, 2007
Docket13-07-00201-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Magdaleno Cruz, Sr. v. Ruben G. Mohme, M.D. (Magdaleno Cruz, Sr. v. Ruben G. Mohme, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magdaleno Cruz, Sr. v. Ruben G. Mohme, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER13-07-201-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________________ _



MAGDALENO CRUZ, SR., ET AL., Appellants,



v.


RUBEN G. MOHME, M.D., Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, MAGDALENO CRUZ, SR., ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-337-06-C(1). The clerk's record was filed on April 25, 2007. No reporter's record was filed. Appellants' brief was due on May 29, 2007. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On August 24, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants' failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellants' failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 27th day of September, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Magdaleno Cruz, Sr. v. Ruben G. Mohme, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magdaleno-cruz-sr-v-ruben-g-mohme-md-texapp-2007.