Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MAGDALENA RUIZ PERKILD, Appellant,
v.
ERIKA SALAZAR, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of
Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2019-DCL-01858-E. Appellant has filed an
unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that
appellee does not oppose the motion. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed
motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is
hereby DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant
to Rule 42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against
appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will
tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request,
no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar (Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.