Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 2019·No. 13-19-00192-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MAGDALENA RUIZ PERKILD, Appellant,

v.

ERIKA SALAZAR, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of

Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2019-DCL-01858-E. Appellant has filed an

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that

appellee does not oppose the motion. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant

to Rule 42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against

appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will

tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request,

no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar (Magdalena Ruiz Perkild v. Erika Salazar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.