Magdalena Ortiz v. State
This text of Magdalena Ortiz v. State (Magdalena Ortiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-14-00521-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
MAGDALENA ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas
ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s unopposed motion for
extension of time to file brief and motion to abate the appeal. The clerk’s record does
not contain a written order extending appellant’s period of community supervision.
Appellant requests this appeal be abated to permit the parties to determine if an order was ever signed by the trial court and filed with the district clerk.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the
unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal should
be granted. The motion to abate the appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered
ABATED until February 27, 2015 or until further order of this Court. Appellant’s motion
to extend the briefing deadline is, accordingly, DISMISSED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 6th day of February, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Magdalena Ortiz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magdalena-ortiz-v-state-texapp-2015.