Magdalena Ortiz v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2015
Docket13-14-00521-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Magdalena Ortiz v. State (Magdalena Ortiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magdalena Ortiz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-14-00521-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MAGDALENA ORTIZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s unopposed motion for

extension of time to file brief and motion to abate the appeal. The clerk’s record does

not contain a written order extending appellant’s period of community supervision.

Appellant requests this appeal be abated to permit the parties to determine if an order was ever signed by the trial court and filed with the district clerk.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal should

be granted. The motion to abate the appeal is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered

ABATED until February 27, 2015 or until further order of this Court. Appellant’s motion

to extend the briefing deadline is, accordingly, DISMISSED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 6th day of February, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Magdalena Ortiz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magdalena-ortiz-v-state-texapp-2015.