Magazines Unlimited v. Benaim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Magazines Unlimited v. Benaim

2 A.D.3d 122, 767 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 122 (Magazines Unlimited v. Benaim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Magazines Unlimited v. Benaim, 2 A.D.3d 122, 767 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered August 26, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to modify/clarify a prior order, same court and Justice, entered March 15, 2002, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it clarified that it was its intention in its prior grant of partial summary judgment to defendant landlords to preclude plaintiff from asserting any claim for damages for personal property left by him in his former apartment and disposed of by defendants subsequent to the City Marshal’s execution of the warrant of eviction on November 22, 1994. This limitation was properly premised upon paragraph 9 (B) of the apartment lease, which expressly provided that upon the lease’s termination the owner would have the option of discarding personal property left in the apartment. Plaintiffs remaining arguments are unavailing. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered August 26, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to modify/clarify a prior order, same court and Justice, entered March 15, 2002, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it clarified that it was its intention in its prior grant of partial summary judgment to defendant landlords to preclude plaintiff from asserting any claim for damages for personal property left by him in his former apartment and disposed of by defendants subsequent to the City Marshal’s execution of the warrant of eviction on November 22, 1994. This limitation was properly premised upon paragraph 9 (B) of the apartment lease, which expressly provided that upon the lease’s termination the owner would have the option of discarding personal property left in the apartment. Plaintiffs remaining arguments are unavailing. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 122, 767 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magazines-unlimited-v-benaim-nyappdiv-2003.