Magadan, Victor v. JS Gardening LLC

2017 TN WC 90
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 16, 2017
Docket2016-06-2107
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 TN WC 90 (Magadan, Victor v. JS Gardening LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Magadan, Victor v. JS Gardening LLC, 2017 TN WC 90 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

FILED

TN C OURI' Of 1\rORJITRS' C01IPE.NS_'\TION C1AD.IS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE

Victor Magadan, ) Docket No. 2016-06-2107 Employee, ) v. ) JS Gardening, LLC, ) State File No. 19824-2016 Employer, ) And ) Auto Owners Insurance Company, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This case came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on May 11, 20 17, on Mr. Magadan's Request for Expedited Hearing. The present focus of this case is his entitlement to additional medical benefits for injuries he sustained in a fire at work. 1 JS Gardening does not contest that the fire occurred or that Mr. Magadan suffered bums from it but disputes the circumstances of his injury and whether the event caused the need for medical treatment he now seeks relative to his eyes, ears and knee. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds Mr. Magadan satisfied his burden, at this stage, to show he suffered an injury by accident arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment and grants additional medical benefits for treatment of his vision and hearing problems but denies his request for additional treatment of his knee.

History of Claim

Mr. Magadan speaks Spanish exclusively. He participated m the Expedited Hearing with the assistance of a state-certified court interpreter.

1 Mr. Magadan's entitlement to temporary disability benefits is also checked as an issue on the Dispute Certification Notice. However, Mr. Magadan offered no proof or argument on the issue at the Expedited Hearing. Therefore, the Court considers the request waived at this time, but Mr. Magadan may raise it as an issue at a later date.

1 Mr. Magadan worked as a lawn care technician for JS Gardening. On March 4, 20 16, he and others were cutting and clearing brush from a hillside and were instructed to bum the debris. Mr. Magadan explained that, because it rained often in the days before the accident, the crew used diesel and gasoline to ignite and fuel the flames, creating a large fire. He testified it was near the end of the workday and he was carrying a gas can in his right hand and a blower in his left hand. He was walking approximately twenty feet away from the fire, when a sudden gust of wind blew flames in his direction and ignited the gas can, engulfing him in flames. Mr. Magadan tripped, fell and rolled on the ground to extinguish the flames. He felt burning all over his body, including his eyes and ears. He testified he felt his eyelashes burning and afterward, his vision became "clouded and foggy." Mr. Magadan suffered bums principally to his hands and face.

Mr. Magadan testified a co-worker, whom he did not identify, took him to Southern Hills Medical Center for emergency care contrary to JS Gardening's instruction that he see providers at a clinic. His co-worker spoke with providers. Mr. Magadan's son, David, then eight years old, also accompanied him to hospital, acting as his interpreter. David testified providers did not ask him what happened. Mr. Magadan spoke to the providers through his son and informed them he was in pain and his entire body hurt. Notes from the encounter document a diagnosis of first- and second-degree bums. (Ex. 2 at 8.) The history states, "'I was working and there was a fire in the trash can, when I got close, the flames went up all around me,"' and, "Thermal bum, fire in a garbage can flashed up ... [causing] bums across face and bil[ateral] hands and wrists[.]" !d. at 13, 1. Mr. Magadan denied he gave a history involving a garbage can. The notes further state, "First degree bums noted to pt face, singed eyebrows bilaterally . . . 1st degree bums noted to bil[ateral] ears." !d. at 16. The Southern Hills providers released him on the same day. Mr. Magadan introduced photographs into evidence of the bums as they appeared while receiving treatment at Southern Hills and afterward at home over the next two weeks or so. (Ex. 12.)

JS Gardening initially denied the claim but afterward sought medical evaluations of Mr. Magadan's injuries, offering him several panels over the coming weeks. Mr. Magadan chose Vanderbilt Bum Center as his authorized treating physician for the facial and hand bums, which treatment he received.

For his hearing loss, Mr. Magadan selected Dr. David Fortune, who ultimately assigned a one-percent whole-body impairment rating but also indicated that Mr. Magadan was not at maximum medical improvement. (Ex. 2 at 26-27.) Dr. Fortune's notes state, "On March 4th, patient was burning brush and had a tank of gasoline in his right hand when the tank exploded. . . . Since the explosion, patient complains of right ear pain and hearing loss/tinnitus in both ears." !d. at 24. The notes further indicate that Mr. Magadan denied any hearing loss prior to the accident, as well as a family history of hearing loss. !d.

2 Mr. Magadan chose Dr. Ira Shivitz for his vision problems. The only records of this treatment indicate Dr. Shivitz saw him once in May, diagnosing bilateral stationary peripheral pterygium, pinguecula of the left eye and moderate conjunctivitis. !d. at 22. Dr. Shivitz's history provides, '"gas can blew up in patients [sic] face in the right eye and left eye. . .. the condition is associated with was on fire." !d. at 18. Dr. Shivitz instructed Mr. Magadan to return in three weeks, but there are no office notes in the record indicating whether this occurred. 2 !d. at 22.

Ultimately, JS Gardening additionally offered a panel of orthopedists, and Mr. Magadan chose Dr. Joseph Wieck, whom he saw in August. Dr. Wieck noted, '"He injured his knee at work when a gasoline container he was carrying exploded." !d. at 30. He diagnosed acute right-knee pain and right-hand pain, ordered x-rays, and an MRI of the knee. !d. at 31-32. The insurance adjuster sent Dr. Wieck a letter in October asking, '"In your medical opinion and to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, did the alleged March 4, 2016 accident contribute more than 50 percent in causing the degenerative tear to the medial meniscus with associated para meniscal cyst identified on the MRI, considering all causes?" Dr. Wieck checked '"no." (Ex. 10.) JS Gardening filed a Notice of Controversy afterward, arguing that the right-knee injury is not work-related. (Ex. 11.) However, the notice is silent regarding Mr. Magadan's hearing loss and vision problems.

Mr. Magadan filed a Request for Expedited Hearing with an accompanying affidavit indicating he still suffers pain and redness in his eye and is very light-sensitive. He testified that his knee is still painful as well and it is difficult to walk longer than thirty minutes to an hour, making it hard to work. Mr. Magadan stated he paid for bandages and medications relative to the past treatment, but bills for the treatment remain unpaid. However, he introduced no bills or receipts regarding these sums.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

As in all workers' compensation actions, Mr. Magadan, as the employee, has the burden of proof on the essential elements of his claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 20 15). However, since this is an expedited hearing, he only has to come forward with sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in order to meet his burden. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Applying these general legal principles to the facts of this case, the Court first considers whether Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(3)(A)(i)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 TN WC 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/magadan-victor-v-js-gardening-llc-tennworkcompcl-2017.