Maffucci v. Salem Truck Leasing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maffucci v. Salem Truck Leasing Co.

207 A.D.2d 332, 616 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 332 (Maffucci v. Salem Truck Leasing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maffucci v. Salem Truck Leasing Co., 207 A.D.2d 332, 616 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated December 1, 1992, which granted the defendants’ motion to set aside the jury verdict of $245,800 as excessive and granted a new trial as to damages unless the plaintiff agreed to a reduction of the verdict from $245,800 to $175,800.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

Upon our review of the evidence, we find that the jury verdict did not deviate "materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]). The jury awarded the plaintiff $80,000 for past pain and suffering and $165,000 for future pain and suffering. The parties stipulated to the sum of $800 for property damage. Based on the testimony of the plaintiff and her treating physician, the jury’s finding was supported by the evidence and should not have been disturbed. Bracken, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated December 1, 1992, which granted the defendants’ motion to set aside the jury verdict of $245,800 as excessive and granted a new trial as to damages unless the plaintiff agreed to a reduction of the verdict from $245,800 to $175,800.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

Upon our review of the evidence, we find that the jury verdict did not deviate "materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]). The jury awarded the plaintiff $80,000 for past pain and suffering and $165,000 for future pain and suffering. The parties stipulated to the sum of $800 for property damage. Based on the testimony of the plaintiff and her treating physician, the jury’s finding was supported by the evidence and should not have been disturbed. Bracken, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 332, 616 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maffucci-v-salem-truck-leasing-co-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack