Maffai v. County of Suffolk

26 A.D.3d 419, 808 N.Y.S.2d 904

This text of 26 A.D.3d 419 (Maffai v. County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maffai v. County of Suffolk, 26 A.D.3d 419, 808 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Islip appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated May 17, 2004, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, the Town of Islip failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the Town’s cross motion.

[420]*420We decline the request of the County of Suffolk to search the record and dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it even though it did not appeal from the order. H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.3d 419, 808 N.Y.S.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maffai-v-county-of-suffolk-nyappdiv-2006.