Maeurer v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.
This text of 198 A.D. 917 (Maeurer v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see no occasion to interfere with the discretion of the court at Special Term [See 115 Misc. Rep. 70] in directing service of a bill of particulars of the affirmative defenses raised in the answer. (Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 App. Div. 578.) Plaintiff is not enforcing an exclusively maritime liability, but that of a servant against a land contractor as his direct employer (Maluskas v. Overseas Shipping Co., Inc., 197 App. Div. 224), where the State courts administer the law of New York applicable to workers on shore. The order is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Manning, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 A.D. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maeurer-v-morse-dry-dock-repair-co-nyappdiv-1921.