Maestas v. State
This text of 212 So. 3d 391 (Maestas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation as supported by competent evidence showing his willful and substantial violations. We also agree with the State’s concession of error, and remand for entry of a written order specifying each condition of probation the appellant violated. See Oertel v. State, 82 So.3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case.”); King v. State, 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Revocation affirmed, but remanded for entry of revocation order consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 So. 3d 391, 2017 WL 697745, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maestas-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.