Maestas v. Gittere
Opinion
3 kee 4 BEAU MAESTAS, Case No. 3:23-CV-00330- CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WARDEN GITTERE, et al., ° Defendants. 9 10 On February 24, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of □□□□□□□□□ v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 32). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Friday, April 18, 15 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of 16 time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to 17 the court for decision. 19 DATED: March 19, 2025 . 20 21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maestas v. Gittere (Maestas v. Gittere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.