Maerkle v. State

362 So. 2d 723, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 1978·No. Nos. 78-392, 78-393·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court failed to specify the exact amount of credit appellant is to receive for time served. Therefore, we remand this case with instructions that it now do so. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maerkle v. State, 362 So. 2d 723, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

362 So. 2d 723 (Maerkle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swift v. State
362 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)