Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey City

35 A.2d 714, 131 N.J.L. 160, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 160
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 27, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is affirmed in part upon the reasons stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court and in part upon the general view of the Small Loan Statute, R. S. 17:10-10, et seq., expressed in our opinion in Edelstein v. Hub Loan Co., 130 N. J. L. 511. Such portions of the opinion below as are directed toward the Supreme Court decision in the Edelstein case, 129 N. J. L. 497, are to be read in the light of the subsequent reversal, cited supra, of that decision.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Dong-es, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey City, 35 A.2d 714, 131 N.J.L. 160, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 160 (N.J. 1944).

35 A.2d 714 (Maellaro v. Madison Finance Co. of Jersey City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fleischman
891 A.2d 1247 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
In Re Richards
272 F. Supp. 480 (D. Maine, 1967)
Family Finance Corp. v. Gough
76 A.2d 82 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)