Maeder v. Honig

504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7353
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-1227
StatusPublished

This text of 504 So. 2d 61 (Maeder v. Honig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maeder v. Honig, 504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. Upon review of the record we believe that there is evidence that appellant sustained a permanent injury in the automobile accident allegedly caused by appel-lee and that the trial court erred in finding to the contrary and dismissing appellant’s claim. Cf. Burkett v. Parker, 410 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burkett v. Parker
410 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
504 So. 2d 61, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maeder-v-honig-fladistctapp-1987.