Mae B. Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of Mae B. Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Mae B. Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00266-CV ____________________
MAE B. CURTIS, Appellant
V.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 172nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. E-191,038A ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Mae B. Curtis and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed a joint motion to abate the
appeal for settlement. The parties inform the Court that they have reached a
settlement and require additional time to finalize the settlement documents and file
a motion to dismiss.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated for sixty days. All
appellate timetables, including the time to prepare and file the record, are stayed
during the abatement. The appeal will be reinstated without further order of this
1 Court in sixty days unless before that date the appellant files a motion to dismiss
the appeal, the parties file a joint motion for an agreed disposition of the appeal, or
the parties notify the Court that they require additional time to complete the
settlement.
ORDER ENTERED August 14, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mae B. Curtis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mae-b-curtis-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-texapp-2014.