Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc.
This text of 972 So. 2d 169 (Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Andrzej MADURA, Petitioner,
v.
FULL SPECTRUM LENDING, INC., et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Andrzej Madura, pro se, Bradenton, FL, for Petitioner.
William P. Heller and Kimberly A. Leary of Akerman Senterfitt, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the unpublished order of the Second District Court of Appeal dismissing Madura's *170 petition for writ of certiorari in Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., 926 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Review was initially granted based on alleged express and direct conflict with Hall v. Wojechowski, 312 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion to discharge jurisdiction in this cause. Accordingly, jurisdiction is discharged and this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, C.J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
972 So. 2d 169, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2268, 2007 WL 4258361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madura-v-full-spectrum-lending-inc-fla-2007.