Madtes v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.

54 A.D.3d 630, 863 N.Y.S.2d 684
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 25, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 630 (Madtes v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madtes v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc., 54 A.D.3d 630, 863 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered March 5, 2008, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a foreman steamfitter, was injured when he fell from a 10-foot ladder while working on the renovation of the Cadman Plaza Post Office in Brooklyn. In support of his motion for summary judgment, plaintiff presented evidence that he wanted to use a man lift to perform the pipe reinstallation but was precluded from doing so because he could not use the elevators to transport the lift from the lower to the higher floors. Plaintiff also presented evidence that he could not get his employer’s 14-foot A-frame ladders to the eighth floor because they would not fit in the building stairwell. In addition, plaintiff presented evidence that he was directed by defendant’s project manager to get the job done that day and make do with what equipment was available. With this evidence, plaintiff established his prima facie burden of entitlement to summary judgment.

Defendant’s evidence was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff was the sole cause of the accident so as to defeat summary judgment. The affidavit of defendant’s project manager was not adequate in this regard as it appears feigned to create an issue of fact in that it is inconsistent with his prior deposition testimony. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuzzolino v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.
2018 NY Slip Op 2755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Garten v. Shearman & Sterling LLP
102 A.D.3d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.3d 630, 863 N.Y.S.2d 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madtes-v-bovis-lend-lease-lmb-inc-nyappdiv-2008.