Madson v. Jaso

880 N.W.2d 532, 499 Mich. 960
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 24, 2016·No. No. 153729; Court of Appeals No. 331605·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the order of the Court of Appeals and we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration. On remand, we direct the Court of Appeals to issue an opinion specifically addressing the issue whether the order in question may affect custody of a minor within the meaning of MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii), or otherwise be appealable by right under MCR 7.203(A). If the Court of Appeals determines that the Lenawee Circuit Court Family Division’s order is appealable by right, it shall take jurisdiction over the plaintiff-appellant’s claim of appeal and address its merits. If the Court of Appeals determines that the Lenawee Circuit Court Family Division’s order is not appealable by right, it may then dismiss the plaintiff-appellant’s claim of appeal for lack of jurisdiction, or exercise its discretion to treat the claim of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the application. See Varran v Granneman (On Remand), 312 Mich App 591 (2015), and Wardell v Hincka, 297 Mich App 127, 133 n 1 (2012). We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madson v. Jaso, 880 N.W.2d 532, 499 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2016).

880 N.W.2d 532 (Madson v. Jaso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynn Beth Baum v. David Baum
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Matthew J Crehan v. Thomas McGuire
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Madson v. Jaso
893 N.W.2d 132 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016)