Madsen v. Principi
This text of 15 Vet. App. 269 (Madsen v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On August 8, 2001, the Court issued an order that vacated parts of the July 30, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, and remanded for readjudication in light of the enactment of Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat.2096 (Nov. 9, 2000). [270]*270Specifically, the Court remanded those parts of the decision that denied, as not well grounded, claims for VA service connection for a fractured nose, prostate disability, and urethritis, and that determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the previously and finally disallowed claims for service connection for small airway disease, asthma, pneumonia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The Court dismissed claims for service connection for hydrocele and tumors secondary to Agent Orange exposure because there was no jurisdiction-conferring Notice of Disagreement. On August 28, 2001, the appellant filed a motion for a panel decision.
On consideration of the foregoing and the record on appeal, it is
ORDERED that the motion for a panel decision is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Vet. App. 269, 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1218, 2001 WL 1358716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madsen-v-principi-cavc-2001.