Madry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Madry v. State

125 So. 3d 972, 2013 WL 2493850, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9314

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 12, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-4132

StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 972 (Madry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madry v. State, 125 So. 3d 972, 2013 WL 2493850, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9314 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s untimely and successive postconviction challenge. Appellant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus alleges that the information that was filed in 1980 was not signed. The alleged defect in the information was waived and is not a basis for postconviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.140(g) (“No objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant pleads to the merits.”). Appellant’s claim that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the information was not signed is without merit. Colson v. State, 717 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s untimely and successive postconviction challenge. Appellant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus alleges that the information that was filed in 1980 was not signed. The alleged defect in the information was waived and is not a basis for postconviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.140(g) (“No objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant pleads to the merits.”). Appellant’s claim that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the information was not signed is without merit. Colson v. State, 717 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 So. 3d 972, 2013 WL 2493850, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madry-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack