Madrigal v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Madrigal v. State

269 N.W.2d 725, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1274

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 7, 1978·No. No. 48395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, whose conviction for aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, was based upon a plea of guilty, contends upon this appeal from an order denying postconviction relief that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea because the record does not contain an adequate factual basis for the plea. After examining the record, we conclude that there is no merit to this contention. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, whose conviction for aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, was based upon a plea of guilty, contends upon this appeal from an order denying postconviction relief that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea because the record does not contain an adequate factual basis for the plea. After examining the record, we conclude that there is no merit to this contention. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Madrigal v. State, 269 N.W.2d 725, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1274 (Mich. 1978).

Pincite

269 N.W.2d 725 (Madrigal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.