Madrigal v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Madrigal v. State

269 N.W.2d 725, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1274

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 7, 1978

DocketNo. 48395

StatusPublished

This text of 269 N.W.2d 725 (Madrigal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madrigal v. State, 269 N.W.2d 725, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1274 (Mich. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, whose conviction for aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, was based upon a plea of guilty, contends upon this appeal from an order denying postconviction relief that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea because the record does not contain an adequate factual basis for the plea. After examining the record, we conclude that there is no merit to this contention. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, whose conviction for aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, was based upon a plea of guilty, contends upon this appeal from an order denying postconviction relief that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea because the record does not contain an adequate factual basis for the plea. After examining the record, we conclude that there is no merit to this contention. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 N.W.2d 725, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madrigal-v-state-minn-1978.