Madrid v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Madrid v. State

540 S.W.3d 442

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105112

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 442 (Madrid v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madrid v. State, 540 S.W.3d 442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Madrid appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 24.03 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *443setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Madrid appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 24.03 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *443setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madrid-v-state-moctapp-2018.