Madrid v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Madrid v. State

540 S.W.3d 442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2018·No. No. ED 105112·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Madrid appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 24.03 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *443setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Madrid appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 24.03 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *443setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Madrid v. State, 540 S.W.3d 442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

540 S.W.3d 442 (Madrid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.