Madrid v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided July 31, 2024·No. 1:20-cv-00619·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

FELIPE MADRID,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 1:20-cv-00619-JHR

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Felipe Madrid’s Motion for Order Authorizing Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and Supporting Memorandum, [Doc. 35]. Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, timely responded but takes no position on the Motion. See [Doc. 36]. The matter is thus ripe for decision. Having considered the briefing and relevant law, the Motion shall be granted. Courts may award attorneys who successfully represent social security benefits claimants “a reasonable fee of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled[.]” 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). Whether a requested award is “reasonable” generally depends on the character of the representation, the results achieved, whether counsel was responsible for delay, and whether the benefits awarded were great compared to the time spent by counsel on the case. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). Whether to authorize a fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) is within the Court’s discretion. See 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A); Early v. Astrue, 295 Fed. App’x 916, 918 (10th Cir. 2008) (reviewing the denial of a § 406(b)(1) fees motion for abuse of discretion). Further, when an attorney is awarded fees under both the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and the Social Security Act, the attorney must refund the smaller fee award to the claimant. See Gisbrecht, 535 USS. at 796. The requested fees will be authorized. Plaintiffs counsel asks for $15,998.75, which is less than 25 percent of the total past-due benefits due to Madrid. See [Doc. 35-1, pp. 11-16] (detailing the amounts awarded to Madrid). The fees requested are reasonable in light of the amount of time spent working the case (34.9 hours), the prerequisite knowledge of the law and relevant medical information necessary to prevail, the results achieved (approximately $92,795.00 in past-due benefits), and the typical fees awarded in the District of New Mexico. $15,998.75 in attorneys’ fees thus complies with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and, in its discretion, the Court finds the amount reasonable. The Court thus GRANTS Plaintiff Felipe Madrid’s Motion for Order Authorizing Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and ORDERS that $15,998.75 be paid to his counsel out of Plaintiff’s past-due benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel shall also refund to Plaintiff any fees previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

ho HSS Hon. J erry H. Ritter ~ United States Magistrate Judge Presiding by Consent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madrid v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2024).

Madrid v. Social Security Administration (Madrid v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart
535 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 2002)