Madray v. Department of Human Resources

247 S.E.2d 579, 146 Ga. App. 762, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2559
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1978
Docket56065
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 247 S.E.2d 579 (Madray v. Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madray v. Department of Human Resources, 247 S.E.2d 579, 146 Ga. App. 762, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2559 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

The appellant, whose parental rights in her minor child were terminated by order of the juvenile court, appeals the order, contending only that the evidence did not warrant termination. Though we will not report the particulars here, á fair summary of the evidence is that it showed: the child was unclean, sickly, and severely *763 under-developed mentally and emotionally; the mother was in need of psychiatric care; she was careless with respect to the child’s safety; she was uncooperative with social case-workers, and even threatened one with a rifle; and she had been arrested for voluntary manslaughter after the death of her newborn second child, a death which occurred under the most abhorrently neglectful circumstances. This court has taken a stern view of parental rights terminations, sustaining them only where there has been evidence of "profoundly detrimental and egregious parental conduct” underlying the statutorily mandated determination of deprivation and probable continued deprivation. R. C. N. v. State of Ga., 141 Ga. App. 490, 492 (233 SE2d 866) (1977); Leyva v. Brooks, 145 Ga. App. 619, 623-625 (1978); Code §§ 24A-3201 and 24A-401(h). There can be no doubt here that the evidence amply fulfills that standard.

Submitted June 29, 1978 Decided July 14, 1978. Albert E. Butler, for appellant. H. R. Thompson, District Attorney, Charles W. Cook, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Carol Atha Cosgrove, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of M. A. V.
425 S.E.2d 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
In the Interest of A. T.
370 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Chancey v. Department of Human Resources
274 S.E.2d 728 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Collins v. Martin
267 S.E.2d 858 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
In the Interest of M. A. C.
261 S.E.2d 590 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.E.2d 579, 146 Ga. App. 762, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madray-v-department-of-human-resources-gactapp-1978.