Madorsky v. Regalado

667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1368, 1996 WL 61341
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1723
StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 1007 (Madorsky v. Regalado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madorsky v. Regalado, 667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1368, 1996 WL 61341 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs below, Martin Madorsky, et al., appeal from an order granting final summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants, Marcelino Regalado, Carmen Re-galado, and Delio Trejo. After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the existence of conflicting affidavits demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved by the fact-finder and that these issues preclude entry of summary judgment. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510; Watson v. Hahn, 664 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Goodman v. Anthony, 269 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Therefore, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Hahn
664 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Goodman v. Anthony
269 So. 2d 756 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1368, 1996 WL 61341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madorsky-v-regalado-fladistctapp-1996.