Madogo v. Garland

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Kalalizi Madogo, Civ. No. 25-2530 (JWB/LIB)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING Merrick B. Garland, US Attorney General; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Department of Homeland Security; and Kevin Raycraft, Field Officer Director for the Minneapolis Field Office,

Respondents.

United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on July 16, 2025. (Doc. No. 7.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The July 16, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: August 11, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge