Madlock v. Westar Energy, Inc.

517 S.W.3d 678, 2017 WL 2117431, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 434
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 2017
DocketWD 79659 consolidated with WD 79662
StatusPublished

This text of 517 S.W.3d 678 (Madlock v. Westar Energy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madlock v. Westar Energy, Inc., 517 S.W.3d 678, 2017 WL 2117431, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Adidas Madlock and Laila Madlock brought an action in the Circuit Court of Jackson County against Westar Energy, Inc. for the wrongful death of them mother, Lachellé Kemp, as a result an automobile accident in Kansas. Westar is a Kansas corporation with its principal place of business in Kansas. The circuit court dismissed the Madlocks’ claims against Westar on the basis that Westar lacks sufficient contacts with Missouri to support general personal jurisdiction over Westar for lawsuits unrelated to its Missouri contacts. The Madlocks appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in dismissing the action because Westar consented to general personal jurisdiction by registering to do business in Missouri as a foreign corporation, and appointing a Missouri agent for service of process.

Following oral argument in this case, the Missouri Supreme Court decided State ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Dolan, 512 S.W.3d 41 (2017). Norfolk Southern held that “the [foreign-corporation] registration statute does not provide an independent basis for broadening Missouri’s personal jurisdiction to include suits unrelated to the corporation’s forum activities when the usual bases for general jurisdiction are not present.” Id. at 52. In light of the Norfolk Southern decision, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Dolan
512 S.W.3d 41 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 S.W.3d 678, 2017 WL 2117431, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madlock-v-westar-energy-inc-moctapp-2017.