Madjorous v. State
3 Ohio Law. Abs. 660
This text of 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 660 (Madjorous v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Madjorous v. State, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 660 (Ohio 1925).
Opinion
The prohibition against remission of fines and suspension of sentence provided in section 6212-17, General Code, is a valid exercise of legislative power and does not invalidate the operative provisions of that section.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Ohio Law. Abs. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madjorous-v-state-ohio-1925.