Madison v. Wright

12 F. App'x 127
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2001·No. 01-6155·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Lamont Madison seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Madison v. Wright, No. CA-99-868 (E.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madison v. Wright, 12 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2001).

12 F. App'x 127 (Madison v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related