Madison v. W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Madison v. W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Co.

211 S.W.3d 638, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 2007 WL 92607

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

DocketED 88150

StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 638 (Madison v. W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madison v. W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Co., 211 S.W.3d 638, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 2007 WL 92607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Company, et al., (“Employers”) appeal from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ found that Employers were the employers of Keith Madison (“Employee”) under the workers’ compensation law, that Employers had five or more employees, and that Employee’s injuries were work-related. The ALJ found that Employee incurred medical expenses of $8,102.98, and that Employee was permanently partially disabled, and awarded him an additional $16,000 from Employers. Employers contend that the ALJ lacked jurisdiction over them and that the ALJ erred in finding an employer-employee relationship existed between Employee and certain of the Employers. Employers also assert that the ALJ erred in finding against William A. Thomas because he is deceased and could not have been an employer under the Workers Compensation Law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

W.A. Thomas Real Estate Appraisal Company, et al., (“Employers”) appeal from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ found that Employers were the employers of Keith Madison (“Employee”) under the workers’ compensation law, that Employers had five or more employees, and that Employee’s injuries were work-related. The ALJ found that Employee incurred medical expenses of $8,102.98, and that Employee was permanently partially disabled, and awarded him an additional $16,000 from Employers. Employers contend that the ALJ lacked jurisdiction over them and that the ALJ erred in finding an employer-employee relationship existed between Employee and certain of the Employers. Employers also assert that the ALJ erred in finding against William A. Thomas because he is deceased and could not have been an employer under the Workers Compensation Law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.W.3d 638, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 78, 2007 WL 92607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madison-v-wa-thomas-real-estate-appraisal-co-moctapp-2007.