Madison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Madison v. State

464 S.W.3d 270, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2015 WL 3759440

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2015·No. No. ED 101849·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.'

Lawrence Madison (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without-an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal- and find the motion court did not.clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [271] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.'

Lawrence Madison (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without-an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal- and find the motion court did not.clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [271] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Madison v. State, 464 S.W.3d 270, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2015 WL 3759440 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

464 S.W.3d 270 (Madison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.