Madison v. Provost
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
12-MAY-2025
10:46 AM
Dkt. 5 ODSAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
MARISA MADISON, fka MARISA M. PROVOST, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CHARLETON J. PROVOST,
Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 2DV181000378)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
It appearing that the Intermediate Court of Appeals had not filed a judgment on appeal in the above-referenced matter when the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2016), It is ordered that Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed May 9, 2025, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 12, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Madison v. Provost (Madison v. Provost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.