Madison Import Corp. v. United States
This text of 51 Cust. Ct. 153 (Madison Import Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “amp-15, Amplifiers, ‘mello tone,’ ” consists of “electric guitar pick-ups” in chief value of metal, which are optional equipment for acoustical guitars and are suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Cust. Ct. 153, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madison-import-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1963.