Madison (Courtney) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
COURTNEY MADISON, No. 80812 Appellant,
VS.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
APR Ø 9 2020 ELI TO BROWN
F S REME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPLITf CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to suppress statements and an order denying a pretrial motion to sever. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion to suppress statements or an order denying a pretrial motion to sever. See NRS 177.015(2) (only the State may appeal from a pretrial order granting or denying a motion to suppress evidence); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990) (the right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J. J.
Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 44110.
20-i3noi
IIINENIM
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Courtney Madison Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Benjamin J. Nadig
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A OOP 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Madison (Courtney) Vs. State (Madison (Courtney) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.