Madison (Courtney) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2020·No. 80812·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

COURTNEY MADISON, No. 80812 Appellant,

VS.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

APR Ø 9 2020 ELI TO BROWN

F S REME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY DEPLITf CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to suppress statements and an order denying a pretrial motion to sever. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion to suppress statements or an order denying a pretrial motion to sever. See NRS 177.015(2) (only the State may appeal from a pretrial order granting or denying a motion to suppress evidence); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990) (the right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. J.

Hardesty Cadish SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 44110.

20-i3noi

IIINENIM

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Courtney Madison Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Benjamin J. Nadig

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A OOP 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madison (Courtney) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Madison (Courtney) Vs. State (Madison (Courtney) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)