Madison Avenue Corp. v. Stokes

308 U.S. 518, 60 S. Ct. 180
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 22, 1939·No. No. 486·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 286 U. S. 472, 476; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563, 571-572; Swiss Oil Corporation v. Shanks, 273 U. S. 407, 412-413; Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson, 271 U. S. 50, 54-55.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madison Avenue Corp. v. Stokes, 308 U.S. 518, 60 S. Ct. 180 (1939).

308 U.S. 518 (Madison Avenue Corp. v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky
217 U.S. 563 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
271 U.S. 50 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks
273 U.S. 407 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query
286 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1932)