Madilynn Mary Ellen Every v. MGM Trucking LLC, et al.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
MADILYNN MARY ELLEN EVERY,
Plaintiff, 1:25-CV-560-DAB-LPA v.
MGM TRUCKING LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER This matter is before the Court for review of the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation filed on March 26, 2026. (D.E. 14.) The Magistrate Judge recommends granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Add New Party (D.E. 9) and remanding to the state court in which the case originated. The deadline for objections passed on April 9, 2026, and no parties have objected to the Recommendation. Because there are no objections, the Court “must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 72 advisory committee’s note). This Court has accordingly reviewed the Recommendation and concludes it contains no clear error. As the new defendant in the Amended Complaint is a North Carolina corporation, complete diversity is destroyed, depriving this court of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (D.E. 14) is ADOPTED and this action is REMANDED to Cabarrus County Superior Court, with each party to bear his, her or its own costs and attorney’s fees, as this court no longer has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action. This the 16th day of April, 2026. /s/ David A. Bragdon United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Madilynn Mary Ellen Every v. MGM Trucking LLC, et al. (Madilynn Mary Ellen Every v. MGM Trucking LLC, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.