Madill Oil & Cotton Co. v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Madill Oil & Cotton Co. v. Davidson

1916 OK 510, 157 P. 354, 59 Okla. 31, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1084

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 2, 1916

Docket7516

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 510 (Madill Oil & Cotton Co. v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madill Oil & Cotton Co. v. Davidson, 1916 OK 510, 157 P. 354, 59 Okla. 31, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1084 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This is an action in replevin commenced h.v the Madill Oil & Cotton Company to recover possession of certain personal property from W. O. Davidson. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in judgment for defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.

The sole question urged by plaintiff in its brief is that there was no evidence to sustain the verdict. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence was conflicting. The rule of universal application in this jurisdiction is that in an action at law where there is any evidence adduced upon the trial reasonably tending to sustain a verdict, the same will not he disturbed upon appeal.

The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI