Mader v. Johnson

74 A.D.3d 1342, 903 N.Y.S.2d 243
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (O’Connor, J.), dated March 19, 2009, which, after a hearing, in effect, granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition is denied, and the matter, is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for further proceedings on the petition.

The petitioner established that the respondent committed the family offense of aggravated harassment in the second degree, by the respondent’s admission that he left several telephone messages for the petitioner threatening that he was going to “get her” (see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 240.30; cf People v Dei, 2 AD3d 1459 [2003]). Fisher, J.P., Covello, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mader v. Johnson, 74 A.D.3d 1342, 903 N.Y.S.2d 243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

74 A.D.3d 1342 (Mader v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chu Man Woo v. Qiong Yun Xi
106 A.D.3d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)