MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA
This text of MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA (MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 27, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-571 Lower Tribunal No. 17-1186 ________________
Madelyn Valdes Roman, Appellant,
vs.
In Re: Estate of Maria M. Ignarra, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.
Madelyn Valdes Roman, in proper person.
Paul M. Cowan & Associates, P.A., and Paul M. Cowan, Anthony M. Diblasi and Manuel A. Celaya, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64, 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
(“[T]he circuit court, in its probate capacity, [has] jurisdiction to determine the
right of possession of real property in matters relating to the settlement of
the estates of decedents. Consequently, the probate court has jurisdiction
to handle the dispute over the right to possession of the estate’s real
property.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madelyn-valdes-roman-v-in-re-estate-of-maria-m-ignarra-fladistctapp-2021.