MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 2021
Docket21-0571
StatusPublished

This text of MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA (MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 27, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-571 Lower Tribunal No. 17-1186 ________________

Madelyn Valdes Roman, Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Estate of Maria M. Ignarra, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.

Madelyn Valdes Roman, in proper person.

Paul M. Cowan & Associates, P.A., and Paul M. Cowan, Anthony M. Diblasi and Manuel A. Celaya, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64, 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)

(“[T]he circuit court, in its probate capacity, [has] jurisdiction to determine the

right of possession of real property in matters relating to the settlement of

the estates of decedents. Consequently, the probate court has jurisdiction

to handle the dispute over the right to possession of the estate’s real

property.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swartz v. Russell
481 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MADELYN VALDES ROMAN v. IN RE: ESTATE OF MARIA M. IGNARRA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madelyn-valdes-roman-v-in-re-estate-of-maria-m-ignarra-fladistctapp-2021.