Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 418 F.2d 920 (Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Madeleine C. Hackman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
418 F.2d 920
70-1 USTC P 9139
Madeleine C. HACKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Madeleine C. HACKMAN et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 19368, 19369.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 18, 1969.
Madeleine C. Hackman, in pro per.
Michael H. Singer, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Bennett N. Hollander, Daniel B. Rosenbaum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the briefs, oral argument and record, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioners did not sustain the burden of proof upon them to establish their claim that the determinations of deficiencies against them by the Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue, were erroneous.
It is therefore ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States be and they are hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 F.2d 920, 25 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 326, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madeleine-c-hackman-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-madeleine-c-ca6-1969.