Madeira Wine Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 270, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1421
United States Customs Court·Decided March 23, 1949·No. No. 52959; protests 965615-G and 966611-G (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madeira Wine Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 270, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1421 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 270 (Madeira Wine Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)