Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc.

16 F. 749, 5 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 258, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
DecidedJune 4, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 F. 749 (Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc., 16 F. 749, 5 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 258, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193 (circtedmo 1883).

Opinion

Treat, J.

The briefs and authorities have been fully considered, and nothing is found to take this case out of the rulings by the United States supreme court. The forfeiture of the policy was complete before death, and nothing in the nature of a waiver to avoid forfeiture is shown. Stringent as are the rules in ordinary life policies, they should be more rigidly applied in mutual associations. If, under the latter, parties do not meet their obligations,' whereby losses may be paid, why should not forfeiture of their interests be upheld?

Finding and judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gifford v. Workmen's Benefit Ass'n
72 A. 680 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1908)
Knights of Columbus v. Burroughs' Beneficiary
60 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1908)
Woodmen of the World v. Gilliland
1902 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. 749, 5 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 258, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madeira-v-merchants-exchange-mut-ben-soc-circtedmo-1883.