Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc.

16 F. 749, 5 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 258, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided June 4, 1883·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Treat, J.

The briefs and authorities have been fully considered, and nothing is found to take this case out of the rulings by the United States supreme court. The forfeiture of the policy was complete before death, and nothing in the nature of a waiver to avoid forfeiture is shown. Stringent as are the rules in ordinary life policies, they should be more rigidly applied in mutual associations. If, under the latter, parties do not meet their obligations,' whereby losses may be paid, why should not forfeiture of their interests be upheld?

Finding and judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc., 16 F. 749, 5 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 258, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193 (circtedmo 1883).

16 F. 749 (Madeira v. Merchants' Exchange Mut. Ben. Soc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gifford v. Workmen's Benefit Ass'n
72 A. 680 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1908)
Knights of Columbus v. Burroughs' Beneficiary
60 S.E. 40 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1908)
Woodmen of the World v. Gilliland
1902 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1902)